A lot of investors steered clear of this passive investment due to the lack of rent growth, the above market rents associated with these built-to-suit projects and the low going in cap rates. Additionally, the values for this asset class are directly impacted by cap rate trends; there is no opportunity to offset increasing cap rates with rent growth because the contract rent is typically flat anywhere from 60 to 75 years. An investor that purchased a Walgreens at a 5.75% cap rate should know that there is a good chance the property has declined in value in excess of 20% (assuming 7% & up cap rates).

The following analysis is a basic overview of how our company recently estimated the applicable cap rate for a Walgreens property in eastern Oregon.

Analysis

As will be discussed shortly in the National Investor Survey, capitalization rate have jumped recently. This is notably true for asking rates of Walgreens. The Seattle-based senior vice president of CB Richard Ellis’ net-leased group, Jeffery Thomas, was recently reported in February 2009 as saying that because debt markets have become increasingly unstable since the fall of 2007, there has been a significant increase in the number of Walgreens marketed at above 7%. He feels that the ones currently marketed below 7% are stagnating and will soon be re-priced at more realistic levels. This is noted in the following Current Listings Cap Rate Summation Table, where Comparable 6 was just recently re-marketed at a 7% capitalization rate, up from 6.75 in March, 2009. Finally, Jeffery Thomas was quoted as saying that “We fully expect to see the Walgreens’ average asking cap rate reach 8% at some point in 2009.”

The following table summarizes six current listings of Walgreens along the West Coast, with the majority of them located in the Pacific Northwest.

All three of the listings in Oregon have listing capitalization rates ranging from 7.2% to 7.5%. The one Idaho listing is being offered at a capitalization rate of 7.3%. The lowest capitalization rate (7%) is for the California listing, and it is noted that it was being offered at a 6.75% capitalization rate as recently as the end of March 2009. Noting that these are listings in a buyers market, they are likely slightly low to good indicators for the subject.

The following table presents the capitalization rate conclusion by the market extraction method.

Band of Investments Technique – Because most properties are purchased with debt and equity capital, the overall capitalization rate must satisfy the market return requirements of both investment positions. Lenders must anticipate receiving a competitive interest rate commensurate with the perceived risk of the investment or they will not make funds available. Lenders also require that the principal amount of the loan be repaid through period amortization payments. Similarly, equity investors must anticipate receiving a competitive equity cash return commensurate with the perceived risk or they will invest their funds elsewhere.

 To analyze the capitalization rate from a financial position, the Band of Investments Technique is used. Available financing information from lenders and the sales comparables indicates the following terms:

Equity dividend rates vary depending upon motivations of buyers and financing terms. Although investors have been accepting meager equity dividends in recent years as low as 4% for this property type, moving forward opportunistic buyers will be most active and will require higher cash-on-cash returns. This factor is somewhat tempered by the low returns being provided by alternative investment vehicles (stock market, bonds, etc). The previous terms and an appropriate equity dividend rate are used in the Band of Investments calculations, which are presented in the following chart.

National Survey – The investor pool for the subject property includes national, regional and local investors. While all three groups place emphasis on local cap rates, regional and national investors would also strongly consider national cap rate trends due to the potential to invest in other regions that are offering higher rates of return. The following table summarizes national cap rate trends for net-leased properties.  

The preceding table clearly shows that cap rates slowly trended upwards through the end of 2007 and the first three quarters of 2008. The rate of increase sharply escalated in the fourth quarter of 2008 when it increased by 20 basis points. The increase in the most recent quarter was even more pronounced when it jumped by 73 basis points. The year to year increase was nearly a full percentage point at 95 basis points.

Retail properties in the Oregon marketplace have consistently been trading at slightly lower effective cap rates compared to the national averages. The region’s resilience to the changing national real estate market is commendable; however, the sweeping change in the mindset of investors has caught up here as well. Due to the substantially reduced transaction volume (down as much as 75% in 2008), it is rather unclear when the inflection point occurred; nonetheless, local cap rates have bottomed out and are on the rise. Pinpointing the applicable cap rate for the subject using national survey data is somewhat subjective. The most reasonable cap rate that can be derived from this analysis is presented in the following table. 

Capitalization Rate Conclusion – For investments of the subject’s general size and price, and when sales activity is brisk with relative market stability, the Market Extraction Method is most often relied upon by buyers and sellers to develop cap rate decisions. However, recent events indicate rapid and profound shifts in the financial environment and the economy on local, national and global levels. The other two approaches developed have varying limitations, but generally support the upward shift in capitalization rates. Taking all these factors into consideration, the following table summarizes the various capitalization rate indicators and provides the final capitalization rate conclusion.

As I finished off my bear claw and thought things were finally wrapping up, a banker asked a question related to appraisals. My ears perked as the gentleman asked if appraisals were indeed contributing to the downward spiral in values. It seemed like a fair question; prices are negotiated based on other recent prices, which are affirmed and often modified after appraisers declare market value. The problem lends itself to the old complaint that appraisers are sitting backwards on a forward moving horse.

Gratefully, Dr. Hoenig accurately assessed that such a relationship between declining sale prices and declining appraisal values is usually a symptom rather than a cause. Appraisal report what is happening in the market. But, because the issue hits so close to home, I thought I would treat of what causes property values to decline from an appraiser’s perspective.

What causes declines in Market value?

 First let me preface my comments: Purchase price is not always equivalent to Market Value. For a myriad of reasons a seller or buyer may be willing to give or take on a purchase price for reasons unique to them. Market value is a theoretical value that assumes what a sale price should be between two very typical parties, each with equal skill sets and full knowledge of the property.

Consider this example: Royce the appraiser concluded that the Market Value for JoJo’s office building was $2,000,000 in 2006. Later, when asked to do the same assignment in 2009, he concluded Market Value to be $1,600,000. Only two things could have lead Royce to conclude a lower market value in 2009: the Net Operating Income (NOI) was significantly less in 2009 and/or market capitalization rates were significantly higher in 2009.  

Capitalization rates represent the ratio between annual net income and sales price. While the NOI may be falling at many properties (due to increased vacancy rates and/or more competitive rental rates), it almost certainly does not account for the entire value decline in this market. Major value declines also come from the changing status quo between buyers and sellers. Buyers have become much more patient and are expecting a much more favorable ratio between their NOI and purchase price. In other words, when there are fewer buyers (as often is the case in a down market) capitalization rates move upward.

In situations where there are recent comparable sales, anyone valuing a property can easily extract and apply very current and realistic capitalization rates to estimate Market Value. This is because during times of appreciation, the market is usually active. Extracting supportable capitalization rates is easy. However, when transactions are scarce finding market capitalization rates can be significantly harder. When this happens, oftentimes sellers have an unrealistic opinion of value because they are relying on dated capitalization rate sources.

Finding Market Capitalization Rates without Recent Transactions

When comparable transactions are not available, the appraiser’s best option is to look at the most recent transactions, assess how much economic conditions have declined since that time, and appropriately apply some type of upward adjustment to the dated capitalization rates.

How do you make that adjustment? How do you capture the subjective impacts of tighter lending standards and lower market confidence in a quantifiable manner? There are multiple ways to do this. Interviewing active brokers or other market participants for both general information and details on listings and failed transactions is a good place to start. Another option is the Underwriter’s Method. This method can give an appraiser a rough guideline of what a reasonable capitalization rate would be in the current lending and investing environment. Other ideas include going to other markets where recent transactions may have occurred. National surveys of investors provide yet another source that may be applicable to some property types. Explaining these methods and the pros and cons of each one will have to be saved for another article. However, I will say that each of these has strengths and weaknesses. In reality, a good appraiser should incorporate all of these into their capitalization rate analysis where appropriate.

When attempting to conclude a market capitalization rate in a down market, it is important to remember that these other methods take a hefty amount of market knowledge, reliable data, and astute judgment.

Bankers, brokers, appraisers, investors, and developers are all looking forward to when the bleeding stops and confidence again returns to the market. While in the past appraising was sometimes viewed as a necessary evil, market participants are now leaning heavily upon our work. More than ever an appraiser’s un-biased opinion combined with expertise of these complex issues can help buyers, sellers, lenders, and brokers make realistic informed decisions during a tough economic period.