Retail News Blog

There were fewer sales in 2008 than seen in previous years. The reduced number of sales owes in some degree to the lack of credit available and the particular aversion to risk on behalf of lenders as well as investors in the current market. The uncertainty surrounding the ultimate fallout from the downturn in the national economy has led to a pullback from both lenders and investors. While buyers view the market with some skepticism and expect an increase in rates, sellers have remained optimistic or are unwilling to believe that capitalization rates may have risen from historic lows of the mid-2000s when many properties traded in the 5.0% to 6.0% range.

These rates were driven down by equally historically low interest rates spurned by the Federal Reserve Bank’s lowering of the Fed Rate to help jumpstart the economy after the 9/11 terrorist attacks and earlier downturn in the dot.com market. While the lower rates did promote more debt by consumers and made housing more affordable, the subsequent housing boom was not built on solid economic drivers (job gains, increase in exports, etc.) and the run-up in housing prices was not supported. The hastily prepared, adjustable rate loans were bundled together and sold on Wall Street, incorrectly rated and sold to uninformed investors. The US economy, that was held up primarily by the housing market (mortgage companies, lenders, developers, home-builders, contractors, etc. all experienced substantial growth over this period) became very unstable when supply exceeded demand and home prices began to fall. Concurrently, the adjustable rate loans began to see large rate increases that the unqualified buyers were unable to keep pace with. As housing prices declined, borrowers were unable to refinance their loans resulting in defaults. The loans sold on Wall Street were spiraling in value and almost overnight, investors in the large conduit loans stopped buying the paper. Lenders that were not prepared to carry and service the massive amounts of residential and commercial paper were now burdened with loans that had no buyers at rates that were too low to sustain.

The mounting loans that were going into default coupled with the growing uncertainty surrounding the economic outlook and crashes in the global economy caused many banks to stop lending altogether. In late 2008, the Federal Government again interceded to create TARP, a $700 billion dollar bail-out for many of these lenders that had created the market instability, fearing that these companies collapse would spark further economic decline through job losses, lower retail sales and a further decline in housing prices. The government’s primary concern was the lending environment had seized up after Wall Street stopped buying paper. The uncertainty on the part of lenders continues today with some lenders quoting 600 to 2,000 basis points over the historically low Treasury rates for new loans, with only the most qualified buyers and the safest of loans being written. At the same time, loan to value ratios decreased from 90% to 100% down to 50% to 60%.

As a result, only well capitalized buyers even qualify for a loan in the current environment. While sellers have been reticent to sell, since few buyers are even less credit are available for deals priced below 7.0%, qualified buyers have realized that they now control the market and many also fear the uncertainty surrounding pricing. Investors have reported equity return requirements near 12% with limited risk to venture from the sidelines. Consequently, a stalemate between buyers and sellers has taken hold of the commercial real estate market. The standoff will likely continue until sellers, some that have already lost up to 20% in book value on their investments, need to either refinance their existing loans or cannot afford the new payments as rates adjust upwards and, in either event, are forced to sell.

In a published article by Royce Rowles of PGP Valuation Inc, Royce discusses the ratio between annual net income and sales prices.

“While the NOI may be falling at many properties (due to increased vacancy rates and/or more competitive rental rates), it almost certainly does not account for the entire value decline in this market. Major value declines also come from the changing status quo between buyers and sellers. Buyers have become much more patient and are expecting a much more favorable ratio between their NOI and purchase price. In other words, when there are fewer buyers (as often is the case in a down market) capitalization rates move upward. In situations where there are recent comparable sales, anyone valuing a property can easily extract and apply very current and realistic capitalization rates to estimate Market Value. This is because during times of appreciation, the market is usually active. Extracting supportable capitalization rates is easy. However, when transactions are scarce finding market capitalization rates can be significantly harder. When this happens, oftentimes sellers have an unrealistic opinion of value because they are relying on dated capitalization rate sources.”

The following is a sample of recent manufactured home community sales collected from across the United States by PGP Valuation.